Substitute Senate Bill 6242 - An Act Relating
to Establishing a Statewide Strategy for Land Acquisitions and
Disposal
SSB
6242 Lands Strategy - Final Report
On March 11, 2004, just minutes before midnight,
the Washington House of Representatives enacted Substitute Senate
Bill 6242 (SSB 6242) - "An Act relating to establishing a statewide
strategy for land acquisitions and disposal" - as their last act
of the session. Just as it had in the Senate a month earlier, the
bill passed unanimously.
While only two pages in length, SSB 6242 contained
several directives:
The Inventory
With the 1999
Public and Tribal Lands Inventory as a starting point, SSB 6242
tasked the Recreation and Conservation Funding Board (RCFB) to prepare
a report that includes an inventory of habitat and recreation land
acquisitions and disposals (hereafter “transactions”)
dating back to 1980. The inventory would be used to assess several
trends related to recent habitat and recreation transactions, such
as costs, sources of funding, or what process was used to authorize
the transaction. Further, the inventory results would provide direction
in crafting a statewide strategy for habitat and recreation land
transactions.
The specific elements that are required in the
inventory are:
Habitat and recreational land acquisitions and
disposals since 1980 by state agencies, to include:
- Fee simple
- Less than fee simple if the interest is greater
than 50 years
- Acquisitions by local governments that were
funded by state agencies
- Trades between public and private entities
- Gifts
- Principle use of acquired parcel
- Funding source
- Form of appropriation
- Information from local governments on land
trusts, etc.
Statewide Coordinated Strategy
The statewide strategy has several required
elements. Generally, these elements are focused on agency land acquisition
processes. The objective is to find ways to increase coordination,
transparency, and to provide a statewide planning perspective that
incorporates the land holdings of all agencies into a particular
agency’s land acquisition decisions.
- Consistency with RCW
79A.15 – the Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program
Policies
- Acquisitions based on determination of need
- Interagency coordination
- Local government compensation for lost tax
revenues
- Consider options for a no net gain policy
- Consider what policies, priorities and goals
should apply to strategy
What are some of the key questions or issues
that SSB 6242 wants answered or resolved?
- Are state agencies acquiring habitat and
recreation lands for a reason, and not just as opportunities arise?
- Can the state develop a plan for habitat
and recreation acquisitions and disposals, similar to a local
government comprehensive plan?
- Are agencies are talking to each other? Does
“one hand know what the other is doing?”
- State land acquisitions are tax exempt, resulting
in a loss of property tax revenue to local governments. How can
the impacts to local governments be addressed?
- Is there a threshold for determining when
there should be “no net gain” in counties that have
a large percentage of public land already?
- Agency land transactions sometimes occur
without much public awareness. Is there some way to make these
transactions more “transparent?”
- When agencies decide they need to acquire
or dispose of habitat or recreation land, how do they make this
determination? How do we ensure that agencies are using a statewide
focus (that spans other agencies’ ownership/management)
when they decide they need to complete a transaction?
- Sometimes the legislature’s oversight
role is bypassed when an agency is pursuing a transaction.
- Are agencies duplicating one another’s
roles, or do the habitat and recreation land programs within the
different agencies have distinct purposes that complement one
another?
- Why don’t we have just one state agency
that is in charge of all the habitat and recreations land transactions
in the state?
Which state agencies are included in the
study?
This report examines the habitat and recreation
land acquisition programs of the Washington
Departments of Fish & Wildlife (WDF&W), Parks and Recreation ,
and Natural Resources (DNR).
There are other agencies that acquire lands for habitat purposes
that are not included in this report. For example, the Washington
State Department of Transportation acquires habitat lands. The key
difference is that WSDOT’s acquisitions are as mitigation
for impacts related to building roads, or other activities that
are the agency’s primary mission. Put another way, this report
is only concerned with those agencies that acquire habitat and recreation
lands as an end in itself, rather than as a means to some other
end.
When will the report be completed?
The report is due to the legislature on June
30, 2005.
How do I get on the 6242 Update List?
Please e-mail RCO ,
or call (360) 902-3000.